Critical Section

Archive: September 26, 2011

<<< September 25, 2011

Home

September 27, 2011 >>>


vs fifteen years ago

Monday,  09/26/11  08:59 PM

 

"15 years ago, vs today"

(actually it is more like 15 years ago vs 5 years ago; today is another column with iPhones)

 

 

seeing Ray Kurzweil

Monday,  09/26/11  09:54 PM

A few weeks ago I attended the College of American Pathologists' annual convention, and was privileged to see Ray Kurzweil as the keynote speaker for the main session.  Ray is a fascinating and accomplished guy; perfect to address the leading Pathologists in the world on the subject of innovation.  He actually has history with this field, too; his Kurzweil Speech Systems (now Nuance) developed the text-to-speech algorithms used by many pathologists for dictating diagnoses.

Ray is nothing if not an optimist; to him, technology grows in price/performance at an exponential rate, regardless of the underlying dynamics of societies and economies, and this ultimately results in dramatic improvements in the overall standard of living, as well as health.  He pointed out that life expectancy is following this trend, and if we can only live long enough we'll live to see a day when people live much longer.

He talked about the way we're using advances in genomics and "reprogramming the software of the body", with dramatic results.  The implications for medical care are only just know being felt, but will be significant.  Imagine a world in which everyone's DNA sequence is known.  Imagine a world in which changing any gene can be done easily.  This world is closer than we think.  The vast improvements in information processing are also causing big changes; for example, Watson, IBM's computer which defeated world champions at Jeopardy, is now being used to digest and analyze medical diagnoses, with the intent of using it to give doctors advice.

The most interesting implications to me were for business strategy; in his view, technology improves exponentially, but companies can only foresee and plan linearly.  Therefore there will be inevitable disconnects between what we think will happen and what will actually happen.  The most successful companies aren't the ones who can see ahead the furthest, but rather those who can react to unpredictable events the most effectively.  This biases business success toward smaller nimbler companies, and those large companies which are sufficiently distributed to behave like multiple smaller ones.

It was a great talk and will provide me much food for thought.  Already I am asking myself "what things could happen in the next five years much sooner than I expect", and what will be the implications...

 
 

Return to the archive.

Home
Archive
flight   About Me
W=UH
Email
RSS   OPML

Greatest Hits
Correlation vs. Causality
The Tyranny of Email
Unnatural Selection
Lying
Aperio's Mission = Automating Pathology
On Blame
Try, or Try Not
Books and Wine
Emergent Properties
God and Beauty
Moving Mount Fuji The Nest Rock 'n Roll
IQ and Populations
Are You a Bright?
Adding Value
Confidence
The Joy of Craftsmanship
The Emperor's New Code
Toy Story
The Return of the King
Religion vs IQ
In the Wet
the big day
solving bongard problems
visiting Titan
unintelligent design
the nuclear option
estimating in meatspace
second gear
On the Persistence of Bad Design...
Texas chili cookoff
almost famous design and stochastic debugging
may I take your order?
universal healthcare
entertainment
triple double
New Yorker covers
Death Rider! (da da dum)
how did I get here (Mt.Whitney)?
the Law of Significance
Holiday Inn
Daniel Jacoby's photographs
the first bird
Gödel Escher Bach: Birthday Cantatatata
Father's Day (in pictures)
your cat for my car
Jobsnotes of note
world population map
no joy in Baker
vote smart
exact nonsense
introducing eyesFinder
resolved
to space
notebooks
where are the desktop apps?