Critical Section


Wednesday,  10/08/03  01:20 PM

So, Arnold Schwarzenegger is California's new governor.  Yesterday the citizens of our state voted rather decisively to oust Gray Davis after less than a year into his second term, and to opt for Arnold instead.

I won't join the throng of people speculating about the Schwarzenegger governorship.  (Not yet, at least!)  There are many big problems facing our state, not least our huge budget deficit, and Arnold will have to be smart and work hard with many people to solve them. 

Instead, I want to speculate about why he was so appealing.  What is it about Arnold that caused so many people to vote against the incumbent, and for him?


That's it.  Arnold exudes confidence.  He's a winner - he's been a winner his whole life - and when you see this big good looking millionaire with his beautiful wife and kids, you feel like he's going to continue being a winner.  And the people of California want a winner to lead them.

California is not like other places.  We are used to being bigger and better and smarter -- and weirder -- than everyone else.  We are used to setting the pace.  We often try new things - some of them work really well, and some of them are disasters - but our appetite for risk-taking is high.  We are used to being leaders for the rest of the U.S. and the world.  People like to make fun of California and in many cases they have ample justification, but in the end we are admired.

The current set of fiscal problems facing our state are worse than bad, they are embarrassing.   The "energy crisis" we faced in the summer of '02 was of our own making - bad policy, bad management, and bad execution - and this, combined with the dot-com bubble bursting and the economic impact of 9/11, have created a perfect financial storm.  The impact on our schools, our businesses, and our lifestyle have been felt. 

So things are bad, and we are bummed.  We look for someone to blame, and there's Gray Davis.  In some ways he wasn't responsible for any of this - the energy deals, the dot-com bubble, or 9/11 - but on the other hand he didn't appear to be solving the problems, either, so he was a convenient target.

And along comes Arnold, and poof, we want to believeHe has confidence, and that gave us confidence in him.  And that's why we voted for him.

this date in:
About Me

Greatest Hits
Correlation vs. Causality
The Tyranny of Email
Unnatural Selection
On Blame
Try, or Try Not
Books and Wine
Emergent Properties
God and Beauty
Moving Mount Fuji
The Nest
Rock 'n Roll
IQ and Populations
Are You a Bright?
Adding Value
The Joy of Craftsmanship
The Emperor's New Code
Toy Story
The Return of the King
Religion vs IQ
In the Wet
solving bongard problems
visiting Titan
unintelligent design
the nuclear option
estimating in meatspace
second gear
On the Persistence of Bad Design...
Texas chili cookoff
almost famous design and stochastic debugging
may I take your order?
universal healthcare
triple double
New Yorker covers
Death Rider! (da da dum)
how did I get here (Mt.Whitney)?
the Law of Significance
Holiday Inn
Daniel Jacoby's photographs
the first bird
Gödel Escher Bach: Birthday Cantatatata
Father's Day (in pictures)
your cat for my car
Jobsnotes of note
world population map
no joy in Baker
vote smart
exact nonsense
introducing eyesFinder
to space
where are the desktop apps?
still the first bird
electoral fail
progress ratches
2020 explained