![]() |
![]() |
Mark Steyn: we're too broke to be this stupid. "Across the developed world, a beleaguered middle class is beginning to understand that it’s no longer that rich. At some point, it will look at the sheer waste of government spending, the other shoe will drop, and it will decide that it no longer wishes to be that stupid." A total home run, please read it.
Eric Raymond continues his series of rants on how Google's Android is going to defeat Apple's iPhone: Flattening the Smartphone Market. "Common cellphone operating systems like Android, WebOS, and Maemo are depriving cellphone carriers of one of their most treasured means of keeping customers in the dark and feeding them bullshit. They’re making smartphones comparable to each other, and by doing so brutally intensifying the competitive pressure on the carriers." And this is happening fast.
Powerline engages in a moment of snark. In which the NYTimes are caught not knowing that Zinfandel is a red wine. "These aren't sophisticated fools, as many think; they aren't sophisticated, period... There is no respect in which they are more knowledgeable than you are." Buffoons!
There are a few bloggers of whom I'm just plain jealous, because they consistently write better things than I do. Mark Pilgrim is one of them. In me, but you, but me, he introduces the fascinating concept of 25-year friends. "... a 25-year friend is not just 'a friend for 25 years.' It’s not the passage of time that matters as much as the 'of course'-ness of it all. Of course I want to hear about your breakup. Of course you can come over anytime. Of course I’ll help you move... Of course you’ll 'lend' me some money when I hit hard times. 25 years of 'of course.'" How many 25-year friends do you have? I have three.
RIP Art Linkletter. Love this: "I know enough about a lot of things to be interesting, but I’m not interested enough in any one thing to be boring."
Lucas Mathis explains why touchscreen UIs are like command lines. You can't discover the commands, you have to know them. Unlike graphical UIs. Interesting point. Paul Rand wants to dump section one of the 14th amendment. That would be the one where children of illegal immigrants who are born in the U.S. become citizens automatically. Can anyone explain to me why this is controversial? It seems obvious; if you're going to have such a thing as citizens, there are going to be non-citizens, and if non-citizens have a child, that child is not a citizen either. Regardless of the location at which they were born. (BTW I don't agree with Rand on many other things...)
So this is my problem: Future Pundit notes Human Brains not Wired for Consumer Credit. "How were consumers expected to fare in, if not a free-money environment, certainly an easy-money environment here at home? The idea that you can walk into a store with a piece of plastic you may even be a college student with no income and buy $5,000 worth of stuff is unbelievable." I think there's a reality to this, but a reason is no excuse.
![]() |
![]() ![]() |