![]() |
![]() |
I've been ruminating on the value of unique names in business. It is increasingly important/useful to be able to "find stuff" by name, and if you are looking for a unique name, it is that much easier. For example a company name of Aperio is pretty good, because while it isn't completely unique (it is a Latin word) it still isolates search results pretty well. If we named our company Digital Pathology Inc. that wouldn't be nearly as good, at least for searching. And in a not-so-subtle way it wouldn't nearly as good for branding either. Something to keep in mind for Project Q... Oh to be a fly on the wall: Jason Kottke blogs about the New Yorker Financial Summit, with Malcolm Gladwell, Nassim Taleb, and Robert Shiller speaking... "Experts talking about how experts are wrong! My brain is seizing up..." Joel Spolsky hits a familiar nail on the head: why Circuit City failed while B&H thrives. Basically, you have to deliver value to your customers to have a business. That's what it's all about.
Alternative reality: Steve Gillmor says Rest in peace, RSS. "It's time to get completely off RSS and switch to Twitter. RSS just doesn't cut it anymore." I suspect this is just link bait, nobody can really argue Twitter in any way replaces RSS, right? The signal to noise ratios are way different. Huh, looks like the Tour of California is moving to May. That means it would take place head-to-head with the Giro d'Italia, the Tour of Italy. "We will be head-to-head with the Giro but frankly I don't think that will really affect us.. The Giro is a great race, but very few cyclists who are serious about the Tour de France will also race the Giro." Interesting and aggressive move.
And now, ZZZzzz... ![]() |
![]() ![]() |