![]() |
![]() |
Still in Seattle; had a great day visiting the Allen Institute for Brain Science, a large and impressive customer for Aperio. Amazing what they are now trying to do (map the human brain, 10X over), and how they are going about it. Otherwise enjoyable although, you know, life on the road...
So I've been working out at my hotel's gym each morning, and they have CNN Headline News showing on these big monitors hanging on the wall, but the sound is [mercifully] off. It is pretty interesting watching the "talking heads". You can see how stereotyped network "news" has become; we have the pretty girl (who smiles while reporting the deadly plane crash), the serious anchorman, the jovial analyst, the angry expert. Each made up, dressed, and framed to correspond to their type. It is all so phony, so stale. They might be talking about Obama's economic plans or Lindsay Lohan's lover, and they look and act just the same.
"Everyone" views Google's YouTube acquisition as a big success, but apparently YouTube costs $1.65M per day to operate. That's not surprising, considering the server space and bandwidth required, but it does make you think; so why again is this considered a big success? There is no business model anyone has proposed which gets all that money back.
Dave Winer comments on an survey of Twitter in Slate: "It's the best of a class of commentary that says that Twitter is something you can skip if you aren't interested in periodic 140-character reports on mundane people's lives. As I read the piece it made sense, so I was left wondering why I was and still am attracted to Twitter and use it, daily." I am left wondering why he was and still is attracted to it also. The entire attraction is hidden to me.
See you tomorrow... ![]() |
![]() ![]() |