Critical Section

Archive: October 20, 2008

<<< October 19, 2008


October 21, 2008 >>>

(New Yorker 10/20/08 - Red Scare)

Monday,  10/20/08  10:09 PM


New Yorker cover 10/20/08 - "red scare"

"Red Scare"

Scary indeed.  I have to wonder, is this motivated by the impact the financial meltdown has on New York (could be) or by emphasizing the crisis because the average Joe thinks the meltdown was caused by the current administration, and hence will be more likely to vote for Obama (also could be).  With the New Yorker these days, everything seems to be politically motivated. 
Still, nice cover...


Monday,  10/20/08  10:59 PM

Dear diary, today I worked.  Oh and with Shirley traveling, I was a kid taxi.  No ride for me today.  Blech.  Tomorrow will be better :!

Would the last honest reporter please turn out the lights?  Worth quoting in detail, because this is telling it like it is (and like you will not hear it from any of the mainstream media):

This housing crisis didn't come out of nowhere. It was not a vague emanation of the evil Bush administration.

It was a direct result of the political decision, back in the late 1990s, to loosen the rules of lending so that home loans would be more accessible to poor people. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were authorized to approve risky loans.  What is a risky loan? It's a loan that the recipient is likely not to be able to repay.

The goal of this rule change was to help the poor - which especially would help members of minority groups. But how does it help these people to give them a loan that they can't repay? They get into a house, yes, but when they can't make the payments, they lose the house - along with their credit rating.  They end up worse off than before.

Revisiting Scoble's I am not an American rant-response to the I am Joe meme... Instapundit quotes reader Hugh Thorner: "You might be unAmerican if . . . A Vice Presidential candidate schmoozes a crowd by calling them pro-American and you immediately think you're being called un-American."  Heh, indeed.

So what do you think, will GM and Chrysler merge?  TTAC says GM lacks the investors...  Despite calling this a merger, it would really be GM acquiring Chrysler, and it is hard to see what they get out of it, except perhaps more government handout money.  How the mighty have fallen.

John Hodgeman on Boing Boing GOOD EVENING: John Hodgman (aka "PC") blogs on Boing Boing.  Excellent.

The World Series starts Wednesday, and King Kaufman asks Rays vs. Phillies, Who Cares?  And then proceeds to tell you why you should care, if you're a baseball fan...  (link captured as PDF to dodge Salon's paywall)  I care, I like watching baseball, and I've invented a rooting interest - go Rays!

Saturn from CassiniToday's Astronomy Picture of the Day is marvelous; Saturn from Cassini, in all its amazing beauty.  Can you imagine looking out your spacecraft window and seeing that?  For the life list :)

Apropos my rant when new version suck: John Gruber notes If it ain't broke, don't upgrade it.  "Bob Staake, the artist who still uses Photoshop 3.0:  'When I open up Photoshop 3.0, it’s there and ready to go in four seconds flat, and when I have opened CS2 my fingernails will have grown a quarter inch before the app appears.'"  I know exactly how he feels.

Robert Cringley speculates on Apple's HD video plans, noting the H.264 hardware support in the new Mac laptops.  Could be...  It would be nice to have 1080p in iTunes, but 1080i seems just fine.  Rumor has it Apple are preparing to launch HD displays with the AppleTV functionality built in - that would be cool...

Meanwhile Jason Kincaid at Techcrunch thinks Lala may have found the next revolution in music.  They're offering any song "from the cloud" for 10¢.  Hmmm.  And that goes as a credit in case you decide to buy the song and download it, DRM-free.  That actually does sound like a pretty good deal.  Hmmm...

TRYING IT NOW.  Listening to Styx, Too Much Time on my Hands (another worthy entry in the "best loud song" sweepstakes).  Sounds good.  Cost was 0¢ because they offer fifty songs free.  But I probably would have paid 10¢ to listen to this song, this way, anytime I want...  Hmmm.  Stay tuned :)

[Clarification] Turns out a song only costs 10¢ if you want to "add it to your collection".  You can listen to as many songs as you want, FREE, while figuring out which ones to add to your collection.  This rocks pretty hard.

Natalie Portman and Rashida Jones - "puppies"Finally, Ann Althouse notes some celebrities know how to do the "celebrities in politics thing exactly right"...






Return to the archive.

About Me

Greatest Hits
Correlation vs. Causality
The Tyranny of Email
Unnatural Selection
Aperio's Mission = Automating Pathology
On Blame
Try, or Try Not
Books and Wine
Emergent Properties
God and Beauty
Moving Mount Fuji The Nest Rock 'n Roll
IQ and Populations
Are You a Bright?
Adding Value
The Joy of Craftsmanship
The Emperor's New Code
Toy Story
The Return of the King
Religion vs IQ
In the Wet
the big day
solving bongard problems
visiting Titan
unintelligent design
the nuclear option
estimating in meatspace
second gear
On the Persistence of Bad Design...
Texas chili cookoff
almost famous design and stochastic debugging
may I take your order?
universal healthcare
triple double
New Yorker covers
Death Rider! (da da dum)
how did I get here (Mt.Whitney)?
the Law of Significance
Holiday Inn
Daniel Jacoby's photographs
the first bird
Gödel Escher Bach: Birthday Cantatatata
Father's Day (in pictures)
your cat for my car
Jobsnotes of note
world population map
no joy in Baker
vote smart
exact nonsense
introducing eyesFinder
to space
where are the desktop apps?